๐—š๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฎ ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—บ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—•๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ.

0
60

In the statement, the Global Naga Forum (GNF) and other participants called for the immediate prioritization of a just and honorable political settlement to the long-standing Indo-Naga political issue rather than the imposition of restrictive border measures. They emphasized that the Indo-Myanmar border, established in 1952 without Naga consent, is an illegitimate division of their ancestral homeland.

The recommendation categorically rejected the scrapping of FMR and the introduction of biometric surveillance, describing them as oppressive measures that violate indigenous rights, criminalize kinship ties, and restrict traditional mobility across ancestral lands.

The forum firmly opposed any form of border fencing or militarized infrastructure, warning that such actions would only deepen fear and division among the Naga people. Instead, they called for unity across all Naga political groups, civil society organizations, and student bodies to mount a collective resistance.

Leave a reply

Secured By miniOrange
Visitors: 6849