๐Œ๐š๐ง๐ข๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ : ๐‚๐Ž๐‚๐Ž๐Œ๐ˆ ๐’๐ฎ๐›๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐Œ๐ž๐ฆ๐จ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐Œ, ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ฌ ๐Š๐ฎ๐ค๐ข ๐‚๐ฅ๐š๐ข๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐‡๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ

0
68

The Coordinating Committee on Manipur Integrity (COCOMI) has submitted a detailed memorandum to the Prime Minister, countering recent claims made by the United Peopleโ€™s Front (UPF) and the Kuki National Organisation (KNO) regarding historical jurisdiction and ancestral land rights over Manipurโ€™s hill areas.

The memorandum was prepared following the UPFโ€“KNO meeting with Home Ministry officials in New Delhi on November 6 and 7, during which the groups reportedly stated that the hill areas of Manipur were never under the authority of the Maharaja of Manipur. COCOMI described this assertion as โ€œmisleadingโ€ and said it was necessary to present historical records, colonial-era documents, and judicial rulings that, according to the organisation, reflect a different picture.

COCOMI argued that historical evidenceโ€”including references from the Manipur State Darbar Rules of 1907โ€”showed that both the valley and the hill areas were administered under the Manipur State. It cited post-Independence legal continuity, pointing to 1963 and 1979 court judgments that recognised the Stateโ€™s authority over forests and other lands in the hills.

The memorandum also challenged the Kuki groupsโ€™ claim to ancestral land, describing the communityโ€™s presence in Manipur as largely a โ€œcolonial-era settlementโ€ facilitated by British officials between the mid-19th century and early 20th century. It referred to records of British Political Agent William McCulloch, who documented the settlement of Kuki villages as part of the colonial administrationโ€™s frontier strategy.

COCOMI further stated that the term โ€œKukiโ€ itself emerged during the colonial period and functioned as an administrative classification rather than an indigenous identity, arguing that this weakened the basis for claims of indigeneity.

Leave a reply

Secured By miniOrange
Visitors: 44491